Advertisement
Correspondence

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author's Reply to Goodman and Greenland

  • John P. A Ioannidis
  • Published: June 26, 2007
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040215

Media Coverage of this Article

Found additional news media or blog coverage for the article? Please let us know.

Linked Articles

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Problems in the Analysis

Steven Goodman, Sander Greenland
Correspondence | published 24 Apr 2007 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168

Selection in Reported Epidemiological Risks: An Empirical Assessment

Fotini K Kavvoura, George Liberopoulos, John P. A Ioannidis
Research Article | published 6 Mar 2007 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040079

Evolution and Translation of Research Findings: From Bench to Where

John P. A Ioannidis
Essay | published 17 Nov 2006 | PLOS Clinical Trials
doi:10.1371/journal.pctr.0010036

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

John P. A. Ioannidis
Essay | published 30 Aug 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124