# wombat urls ß PLOS Medicine: Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way
Advertisement
Essay

Essay Essays are opinion pieces on a topic of broad interest to a general medical audience.

See all article types »

Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way

  • Ramal Moonesinghe mail,

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:RMoonesinghe@CDC.gov

    X
  • Muin J Khoury,
  • A. Cecile J. W Janssens
  • Published: February 27, 2007
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040028

Media Coverage of this Article

Found additional news media or blog coverage for the article? Please let us know.

Linked Articles

Power, Reliability, and Heterogeneous Results

Ian Shrier
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020386

Truth, Probability, and Frameworks

Jonathan D Wren
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020361

The Clinical Interpretation of Research

Stephen G Pauker
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020395

Author's Reply

John P. A Ioannidis
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020398

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

John P. A. Ioannidis
Essay | published 30 Aug 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Minimizing Mistakes and Embracing Uncertainty

Editorial | published 30 Aug 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020272