Advertisement
Correspondence

The Clinical Interpretation of Research

  • Stephen G Pauker mail

    spauker@tufts-nemc.org

    Affiliation: Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Published: November 29, 2005
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020395

Media Coverage of this Article

Found additional news media or blog coverage for the article? Please let us know.

Linked Articles

Truth, Probability, and Frameworks

Jonathan D Wren
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020361

Author's Reply

John P. A Ioannidis
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020398

Minimizing Mistakes and Embracing Uncertainty

Editorial | published 30 Aug 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020272

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

John P. A. Ioannidis
Essay | published 30 Aug 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124