Advertisement
Editorial

Minimizing Mistakes and Embracing Uncertainty

  • The PLoS Medicine Editors
  • Published: August 30, 2005
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020272

Media Coverage of this Article

Found additional news media or blog coverage for the article? Please let us know.

Linked Articles

When Should Potentially False Research Findings Be Considered Acceptable?

Benjamin Djulbegovic, Iztok Hozo
Essay | published 27 Feb 2007 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040026

Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way

Ramal Moonesinghe, Muin J Khoury, A. Cecile J. W Janssens
Essay | published 27 Feb 2007 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040028

The Clinical Interpretation of Research

Stephen G Pauker
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020395

Truth, Probability, and Frameworks

Jonathan D Wren
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020361

Author's Reply

John P. A Ioannidis
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020398

Power, Reliability, and Heterogeneous Results

Ian Shrier
Correspondence | published 29 Nov 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020386

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

John P. A. Ioannidis
Essay | published 30 Aug 2005 | PLOS Medicine
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124