Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Related Articles info
Related PLoS Articles
Related Articles on the Web 
Bookmarked in 
Related Blog Posts info 
Trackbacks
To trackback this article use the following trackback URL:
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124/trackback
"The intention may have been to vindicate the protagonist in Monty Python's dead parrot skit and to put a new level of depth into the troutslapping scene.
That aside, some but not all neuroimaging papers may contain false positives. A similar thing is seen in proteomics and genomics. The landmark 2005 paper 'why most reasearch findings are false' by Ioannidis [1] discussed this. It is a very interesting introduction to how false positives may be especially pervasive in the life sciences.
[1] http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124"
"An interesting article appeared in this week's New Yorker magazine by Jonah Lehrer entitled "The"
Rate This Article