Advertisement
Health in Action

Health in Action The Health in Action section provides a place where groups or individuals who are not represented regularly in a medical journal have a forum to describe the important issues from their perspective. Authors might include patient advocacy groups, healthcare workers, or non-governmental organizations.

See all article types »

Evidence-Based African First Aid Guidelines and Training Materials

  • Stijn Van de Velde mail,

    stijn.vandevelde@rodekruis.be

    Affiliation: Centre of Expertise, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium

    X
  • Emmy De Buck,

    Affiliation: Centre of Expertise, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium

    X
  • Philippe Vandekerckhove,

    Affiliation: Centre of Expertise, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium

    X
  • Jimmy Volmink

    Affiliation: Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

    X
  • Published: July 19, 2011
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001059

Summary Points

  • In sub-Saharan Africa, much disease and injury can be addressed by emergency care. First aid training has been promoted as an inexpensive way to save lives. However, first aid training in sub-Saharan Africa is often based on handbooks prepared outside of the continent that are not adapted to the African context.
  • We formulated evidence-based guidelines that comprehensively address how basic first responders should be trained to manage emergency situations in an African context. The guidelines focussed on first aid interventions requiring minimal or no equipment.
  • Two assessors reviewed the evidence, giving special attention to studies on African cultural remedies and preferences. A multidisciplinary panel of 11 African experts discussed each recommendation until they reached agreement. GRADE was used to grade the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Peer reviewers gave feedback on the guidelines.
  • These new guidelines formed the basis of a flexible didactic materials kit that is available to those involved in first aid training programmes in Africa. An implementation guide is also available to help tailor the training materials to the local context and target group.

This Health in Action report describes the African First Aid Materials project (AFAM, http://www.afam.redcross.be/). This project developed evidence-based guidelines on how basic first responders should be trained to manage emergency situations in an African context. The project also includes the development of training materials to support the implementation. The objective of this manuscript is to inform educators and health care professionals about these guidelines and training materials and to promote their use when developing first aid training programmes for sub-Saharan Africa.

The Burden of Emergencies

In sub-Saharan Africa, 41% of all deaths and 39% of the morbidity burden can potentially be addressed by emergency care [1],[2]. Road traffic injuries may dramatically increase this burden in the coming years [3]. In many emergencies, prompt and adequate care can increase the likelihood of survival and recovery. Pre-hospital care is a vital initial step; however, it is often unavailable in sub-Saharan Africa. When an emergency occurs, basic first responders often constitute the sole source of initial help, and emergency transport often consists of a ride in taxis, private cars, or public transport [4],[5]. Studies in Ghana and Uganda demonstrated that training basic first responders leads to improved provision of help in the absence or anticipation of medical care [6][8]. Therefore, the World Bank has promoted first aid training as an inexpensive way to save lives in sub-Saharan Africa.

The distinct African burden of disease and injury, the limited access to formal health care, the strong embeddedness of cultural remedies, and poverty all call for specific first aid guidelines. However, first aid training in sub-Saharan Africa is often based on handbooks prepared outside of the continent that are not adapted to the African context. Although well-intentioned, such resources sometimes lead to misdirected, inadequate, or even harmful training instructions. Several African Red Cross National Societies expressed the need for first aid materials adapted to the African context. We are not aware of any evidence-based reference that comprehensively addresses how basic first responders should be trained to manage emergency situations in an African context. Since evidence-based reviews with relevance to low- and middle-income countries are scarce, this added to the importance of our work [9]. Our guidelines are intended to guide those responsible for first aid programmes and to form the basis of African training materials. We defined first aid as “appropriate and beneficial help to a suddenly ill or injured person which is initiated as soon as possible and continued until that person has recovered or medical care is available”. These guidelines focussed on first aid interventions requiring minimal or no equipment.

Summary of Methods to Develop the Guidelines

The guidelines represent the consensus judgment of an expert panel taking into account findings from systematic reviews on the following topics: stroke, heart attack, fever, fits, diarrhoea, rash, wounds and injuries, poisoning, and emergency childbirth. This topic selection was based on published injury and disease statistics for sub-Saharan Africa [1],[2]. For the topics of choking, unconsciousness, and heart arrest, we used the evidence-based guidelines with instructions for basic first responders published by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) [10].

Search Strategy to Identify Relevant Evidence

Between February and April 2009, two assessors (SVDV, ED) identified studies assessing the effects and feasibility of first aid procedures for the selected emergency situations. To identify evidence-based guidelines, they searched the Guidelines International Network (GIN) database, the WHO Library Database, and African Index Medicus using the search terms detailed in the technical appendix (Text S1). MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, BestBets, and African Index Medicus were searched to identify existing systematic reviews. When necessary, they updated the systematic reviews or started a new systematic review of intervention studies. In the case where no intervention studies were found, they also searched for prospective observational studies. A separate review was conducted for cross-sectional surveys and qualitative research on African cultural remedies and preferences in relation to the included emergency situations (criteria for considering studies for inclusion are detailed in Text S1).

Selection of Studies

Based on pre-defined selection criteria (detailed in Text S1), two authors selected studies from the titles and abstracts of all the retrieved references. They then screened full texts and further excluded irrelevant studies. Reference lists of selected studies were checked to identify further studies.

Quality Assessment, Data Extraction, and Evidence Synthesis

The authors assessed the quality of evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), which takes into account limitations in design, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and likelihood of publication bias. The quality of evidence could either be high, moderate, low, or very low [11]. Data on methodology, participants, intervention, comparison, and outcomes were extracted into evidence profiles. A descriptive summary of the evidence and draft recommendations were then prepared for consideration by the expert panel.

Expert Panel

The expert panel included four African specialists with expertise in evidence-based medicine and primary care or emergency medicine, five representatives of African Red Cross societies (managers and first aid trainers), and an expert in medical anthropology. The co-director of the South-African Cochrane Centre (JV), part of the international Cochrane Collaboration, served as the chairperson.

The expert panel met for the first time in September 2009. The aims of this meeting were to identify any potential conflict of interest, to explain the guidelines development methods, and to present the draft evidence synthesis and recommendations. The recommendations were accompanied with photos and drawings that illustrated the conditions and actions. In the next few weeks, the experts revised the draft documents and sent their feedback by email. A checklist based on items from the AGREE [12], GLIA [13], and DISCERN [14] instruments guided the experts through this revision.

A follow-up two-day consensus meeting was held in October 2009. This meeting aimed to reformulate the recommendations until agreement was reached among the full expert panel and to decide on the strength of each recommendation (strong or weak) according to GRADE [11]. The panel discussed each recommendation, taking into account the evidence, the feedback from the preparatory revision, practical experience, and contextual factors. The strength of the recommendation was influenced by the benefits and harms, quality of evidence, applicability, and preferences of the population. If no relevant research evidence was found, the panel based the recommendations on what was considered good practice. In that case, no grade of recommendation was given. The meeting was audio recorded to capture all the comments and decisions in the meeting minutes.

Peer Review

In February 2010, four reviewers who specialised in emergency medicine, traumatology, paediatrics, and obstetrics were invited to give feedback on the guidelines and on the draft of the didactical material. The chair of the guidelines development panel then considered the responses and improvements were made.

Internal Validation

The final version of the guidelines was approved electronically by the expert panel.

Evidence and Recommendations

Overall, we screened 24,000 references and selected 143 publications to provide the evidence base for the guidelines. The systematic reviews allowed us to learn about practices that try to make the best use of the limited resources available. Examples of such practices that were considered by the panel include ash for hand washing [15],[16], homemade oral rehydration solutions for diarrhoea [17], early breastfeeding for emergency childbirth [18],[19], fever measurement by touch [20], tepid sponging for fever [21], boiled and cooled water for wound cleansing [22], application of honey or aloe vera, and dressings from banana leaf or potato peel for burns [23][27].

The complete guidelines (Text S2) include a narrative synthesis of the results of the systematic reviews and recommendations for each included topic. We have chosen to report here the evidence and recommendations for snakebites as a sample of the guidelines.

First Aid for Snakebites

In sub-Saharan Africa, snakebites are a neglected health problem with an important burden of disease for which many victims never receive formal medical care [28],[29]. The application of an elastic bandage combined with immobilisation is an often recommended first aid technique for snake bites. The bandage should be applied tightly, but applying it not tight enough or too tight is ineffective and sometimes harmful [30]. Two studies indicate that applying a compression bandage over a firm cloth pad is effective; however, this technique increases the risk of creating an arterial tourniquet [31],[32]. Two studies indicate that motivated persons have difficulty applying a compression bandage at the correct pressure, even after intense training [33],[34]. One study indicates that walking increases the transit of venom [30]. One study indicates that immobilisation can be taught to basic first responders [34]; however, a field study indicates that after receiving the instruction to immobilise bitten limbs, this was only done properly in a minority of cases [35].

Based on these findings, the panel recommended immobilisation of the bitten limb without application of an elastic bandage. The level of evidence is low to very low with a weak grade of recommendation. Additional recommendations are to stop the bitten person from moving, calming the person, taking off any rings, watches, or tight clothing that may cut off blood flow because of swelling, and taking actions to obtain medical help.

Moving from Guidelines to Training Materials

Writing guidelines is only the beginning and should be followed by measures to support implementation in practice. Therefore, these new guidelines formed the basis of a flexible training materials kit that comes on a DVD. This DVD will be available to those responsible for first aid training programmes in Africa. The training materials include an electronic version of the manual illustrated with hundreds of quality illustrations including youths, adults, and elderly people from multiple ethnic and religious backgrounds. The manual is available in English, French, and Portuguese and describes for every condition the most important signs to look for and actions to take. Currently, didactical posters and videos are being developed to demonstrate the different procedures. Providers of first aid courses can pick what they need from the DVD to compose their first aid courses for their specific target audience.

Although the guidelines attempted to be generic for sub-Saharan Africa, there are local specificities that need to be addressed in order to apply the training materials. For example, misunderstandings and mistrust regarding health information may arise when the biomedical approach is at odds with local perceptions and management. Advice that incorporates local terms, perceptions, and preferences is considered to be more convincing [36]. Therefore, an implementation guide is also available to assist those responsible for first aid programmes on ways to adapt the training materials.

Between June and December 2010 we piloted the training materials and implementation guide in Uganda and Swaziland. These pilots include focus group discussions on whether the illustrations are understood to evaluate clarity, and field-testing the feasibility of more complex instructions. For this purpose, individuals with different levels of experience in first aid (from novice to trainer) were asked to perform specific first aid tasks under different test conditions. The test conditions included performing the task when being provided with drawings only, with drawings and written instructions only, or after the demonstration by a trainer. An observer recorded if the participants completed the task correctly or incorrectly.

Where Is the Project Heading Next?

Implementation of AFAM in the Red Cross national societies from Namibia, Mozambique, South Africa, Malawi, Uganda, Swaziland, the Comoros, and Kenya is planned. We are also developing a strategy to formulate a similar set of guidelines and training materials for South Asia. Furthermore, because first aid training is often used as an entry point for primary prevention, we have commenced a project to formulate evidence-based preventive measures that can be used in addition to the first aid guidelines described in AFAM.

Supporting Information

Text S1.

Further details of methods.

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001059.s001

(DOCX)

Text S2.

African First Aid Materials: Guidelines (Belgian Red Cross-Flanders).

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001059.s002

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

Members of the AFAM expert panel were Jimmy Volmink (chair) (South African Cochrane Centre, Medical Research Council; Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University), Benson Agbro (Nigerian Red Cross), Omar Ahmed (International Centre for AIDS Care & Treatment Programs, Ethiopia), Jenny Bakker (South African Red Cross), Paul Bitex Okot (Uganda Red Cross), Stephen Gichuhi (University of Nairobi, Kenya), Walter Jaoko (University of Nairobi, Kenya), Sylvia Khamati Anekha (Kenya Red Cross), Hayley Macgregor (University of Sussex, United Kingdom), Navin Naidoo (Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa), Jérôme Sebaganwa (Rwandan Red Cross), and Philippe Vandekerckhove (Belgian Red Cross-Flanders).

Evidence reviewers were Emmy De Buck (Belgian Red Cross-Flanders) and Stijn Van de Velde (Belgian Red Cross-Flanders).

Peer reviewers were Emmanuel Bottieau (Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Belgium), Anja De Weggheleire (Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Belgium), Els Duysburgh (International Centre for Reproductive Health, Belgium), An Sermon (University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium), Marleen Temmerman (International Centre for Reproductive Health, Belgium), and Lee Wallis (Stellenbosch University, University of Cape Town, South Africa).

The coordinator of the pilot test was An Vanderheyden (Belgian Red Cross-Flanders).

T. Young (South African Cochrane Centre; RYTD Consultancy) wrote the expert panel meeting minutes and provided support in editing the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Wrote the first draft of the paper: SVDV. Contributed to the writing of the paper: ED PV JV. ICMJE criteria read and met: SVDV EDB PV JV. Agree with the manuscript's results and conclusions: SVDV EDB PV JV. Designed the guideline development plan: SVDV PV JV. Performed the systematic reviews: SVDV ED. Chaired the guideline development group: JV. Guarantor of the guideline: JV. Chaired the AFAM steering group: PV.

References

  1. 1. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL (2006) Global burden of disease and risk factors. New York: Oxford University Press. 475 p.
  2. 2. Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, et al. (2006) Disease control priorities in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press and The World Bank. 1352 p.
  3. 3. Lagarde E (2007) Road traffic injury is an escalating burden in Africa and deserves proportionate research efforts. PLoS Med 4: e170. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040170.
  4. 4. Saidi HS (2003) Initial injury care in Nairobi, Kenya: a call for trauma care regionalisation. East Afr Med J 80: 480–483.
  5. 5. Bertrand E, Muna WFT, Diouf SM, Ekra A, Kane A, et al. (2006) Cardiovascular emergencies in Subsaharan Africa. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 99: 1159–1165.
  6. 6. Tiska MA, du-Ampofo M, Boakye G, Tuuli L, Mock CN (2004) A model of prehospital trauma training for lay persons devised in Africa. Emerg Med J 21: 237–239.
  7. 7. Mock CN, Tiska M, du-Ampofo M, Boakye G (2002) Improvements in prehospital trauma care in an African country with no formal emergency medical services. J Trauma 53: 90–97.
  8. 8. Jayaraman S, Mabweijano JR, Lipnick MS, Caldwell N, Miyamoto J, et al. (2009) First things first: effectiveness and scalability of a basic prehospital trauma care program for lay first-responders in Kampala, Uganda. PLoS ONE 4: e6955. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006955.
  9. 9. Richards T, Tumwine J (2004) Poor countries make the best teachers: discuss. BMJ 329: 1113–1114.
  10. 10. KosterSayreBothaCaveCudnik (2010) Part 5: Adult basic life support: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation 81: Suppl 1e48–e70.
  11. 11. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328: 1490.
  12. 12. AGREE Collaboration (2003) Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 12: 18–23.
  13. 13. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, Essaihi A, Hsiao A, et al. (2005) The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 5: 23.
  14. 14. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53: 105–111.
  15. 15. Hoque BA, Briend A (1991) A comparison of local handwashing agents in Bangladesh. J Trop Med Hyg 94: 61–64.
  16. 16. Hoque BA, Mahalanabis D, Alam MJ, Islam MS (1995) Post-defecation handwashing in Bangladesh: practice and efficiency perspectives. Public Health 109: 15–24.
  17. 17. Kenya PR, Muttunga JN, Mwenesi H, Molla AM, Bari A, et al. (2001) Comparison of safety of glucose oral rehydration solution and maize oral rehydration therapy for home management of diarrhoea in Kenya. J Trop Pediatr 47: 226–229.
  18. 18. van den Bosch CA, Bullough CH (1990) Effect of early suckling on term neonates' core body temperature. Ann Trop Paediatr 10: 347–353.
  19. 19. Bullough CH, Msuku RS, Karonde L (1989) Early suckling and postpartum haemorrhage: controlled trial in deliveries by traditional birth attendants. Lancet 2: 522–525.
  20. 20. Teng CL, Ng CJ, Nik-Sherina H, Zailinawati AH, Tong SF (2008) The accuracy of mother's touch to detect fever in children: a systematic review. J Trop Pediatr 54(1): 70–73.
  21. 21. Meremikwu M, Oyo-Ita A (2003) Physical methods for treating fever in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. CD004264 p.
  22. 22. Fernandez R, Griffiths R (2008) Water for wound cleansing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. CD003861. CD003861 p.
  23. 23. Keswani MH, Vartak AM, Patil A, Davies JW (1990) Histological and bacteriological studies of burn wounds treated with boiled potato peel dressings. Burns 16: 137–143.
  24. 24. Gore MA, Akolekar D (2003) Evaluation of banana leaf dressing for partial thickness burn wounds. Burns 29: 487–492.
  25. 25. Subrahmanyam M (1996) Honey dressing versus boiled potato peel in the treatment of burns: a prospective randomized study. Burns 22: 491–493.
  26. 26. Maenthaisong R, Chaiyakunapruk N, Niruntraporn S, Kongkaew C (2007) The efficacy of aloe vera used for burn wound healing: a systematic review. Burns 33(6): 713–718.
  27. 27. Jull AB, Rodgers A, Walker N (2008) Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. CD005083 p.
  28. 28. Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, et al. (2008) The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med 5: e218. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218.
  29. 29. Gutierrez JM, Theakston RD, Warrell DA (2006) Confronting the neglected problem of snake bite envenoming: the need for a global partnership. PLoS Med 3: e150. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030150.
  30. 30. Howarth DM, Southee AE, Whyte IM (1994) Lymphatic flow rates and first-aid in simulated peripheral snake or spider envenomation. Med J Aust 161: 695–700.
  31. 31. Anker RL, Straffon WG, Loiselle DS, Anker KM (1983) Snakebite. Comparison of three methods designed to delay uptake of ‘mock venom’. Aust Fam Physician 12: 365–368.
  32. 32. Anker RL, Straffon WG, Loiselle DS, Anker KM (1982) Retarding the uptake of "mock venom" in humans: comparison of three first-aid treatments. Med J Aust 1: 212–214.
  33. 33. Simpson ID, Tanwar PD, Andrade C, Kochar DK, Norris RL (2008) The Ebbinghaus retention curve: training does not increase the ability to apply pressure immobilisation in simulated snake bite–implications for snake bite first aid in the developing world. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 102: 451–459.
  34. 34. Norris RL, Ngo J, Nolan K, Hooker G (2005) Physicians and lay people are unable to apply pressure immobilization properly in a simulated snakebite scenario. Wilderness Environ Med 16: 16–21.
  35. 35. Pe T, Mya S, Myint AA, Aung NN, Kyu KA, et al. (2000) Field trial of efficacy of local compression immobilization first-aid technique in Russell's viper (Daboia russelii siamensis) bite patients. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 31: 346–348.
  36. 36. Sabuni LP (2007) Dilemma with the local perception of causes of illnesses in central Africa: muted concept but prevalent in everyday life. Qual Health Res 17: 1280–1291.