Advertisement
Correspondence

Consumer Advertising Can Be Misleading

  • Karl Rickels mail

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: krickels@mail.med.upenn.edu

    Affiliation: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

    X
  • Published: February 28, 2006
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030119

The Essay by Lacasse and Leo [1] demonstrates clearly how consumer advertising—in all fields of medicine, not only psychiatry—can at the least be misleading, making patients choose treatments that may not be the best choice in each particular circumstance. I agree with the authors that the “serotonin” hypothesis does not fully explain the mechanism of the serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of anxiety disorders and depression.

In my clinical treatment of patients, consumer advertising is not only not helpful but often causes significant management problems. In addition, consumer advertising only focuses on expensive, patented medications and not on equally good generic alternatives. A good example is the consumer advertising of “the purple pill,” Nexium, while generic Prilosec, equally effective in almost all patients, is not advertised.

Let's prohibit all consumer advertising of patented medications. It will save physicians much headache, and patients or their insurers a great deal of money.

References

  1. 1. Lacasse JR, Leo J (2005) Serotonin and depression: A disconnect between the advertisements and the scientific literature. PLoS Med 2: e392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020392.