Search
Advanced Search
Metrics info
Average Rating (0 User Ratings)
    • Currently 0/5 Stars.
    Rate This Article
Share this Article info
  • StumbleUpon Facebook Connotea CiteULike Bibliography
Public Library of Science

Open Access

Correction

Correction: The Chilling Effect: How Do Researchers React to Controversy

Joanna Kempner

Correction for:

Kempner J (2008) The chilling effect: How do researchers react to controversy? PLoS Med 5(11): e222. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050222

An intermediate version of the interview guide was incorrectly included in Text S1 and published in the Supporting Information section. An updated version of the interview guide can be found in the corrected Text S1 below.

Supporting Information

Corrected Text S1.

Protocols and Consent Forms

Found at doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000014.sd001 (450 KB DOC).

Post Your Note (For Public Viewing)
Compose Your Note
 
Declare any competing interests.

Notes and Corrections can include the following markup tags:

Emphasis: ''italic''  '''bold'''  '''''bold italic'''''

Other: ^^superscript^^  ~~subscript~~

Add a note to this text.
Please follow our guidelines for notes and comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  • Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  • Unsupported assertions or statements
  • Inflammatory or insulting language
Add a note to this text.
You must be logged in to add a note to an article. You may log in by clicking here or cancel this note.
Add a note to this text.
You cannot annotate this area of the document. Close
Add a note to this text.
You cannot create an annotation that spans different sections of the document; please adjust your selection.
Close
Rate This Article
Please follow our guidelines for rating and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  1. Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  2. Unsupported assertions or statements
  3. Inflammatory or insulting language
Compose Your Annotation
 
Declare any competing interests.

Ratings can include the following markup tags:

Emphasis: ''italic''  '''bold'''  '''''bold italic'''''

Other: ^^superscript^^  ~~subscript~~

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.