Search
Advanced Search
Metrics info
Average Rating (0 User Ratings)
    • Currently 0/5 Stars.
    Rate This Article
Share this Article info
  • Bookmark: StumbleUpon Facebook Connotea CiteULike Bibliography
Public Library of Science

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Understanding the Slow Depletion of Memory CD4+ T Cells in HIV Infection

Andrew Yates, Jaroslav Stark, Nigel Klein, Rustom Antia, Robin Callard

Correction for:

Yates A, Stark J, Klein N, Antia R, Callard R (2007) Understanding the slow depletion of memory CD4+ T cells in HIV infection. PLoS Med 4(5): e177. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040177

In the published manuscript, Figures 3, 4, 6, and 7 were generated using slightly different parameter values than those quoted in the captions. Corrected versions of these figures are shown here. None of the conclusions of the study change as a result.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Steady-State Pool Size as a Function of Virus Infectivity p

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050011.g001
thumbnail

Figure 4. The Predicted Time for Memory CD4+ T Cell Numbers to Decline from 100% to 50% of Healthy Numbers, as a Function of Virus Infectivity p

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050011.g002
thumbnail

Figure 6. The Predicted Steady-State Pool Size as a Function of Virus Infectivity p, in the Presence of Different Levels of Immune Activation a*

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050011.g003
thumbnail

Figure 7. The Predicted Time Course of CD4+ Memory T Cell Numbers as They Decline to Their Steady State Level for Different Levels of Immune Activation a* in the Presence of HIV

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050011.g004

Other minor corrections:

The homeostatically dividing cell death rate μ is 0.77/day, not 1.06 as stated in the original caption to Figure 4. This rate is calculated using the constraint that approximately 1% of CD4+ T cells in blood are activated at the healthy set point, giving



In the third paragraph of the Results section, in the sentence beginning, “For the simulations we show below, we used the linear forms…”, the equation should read a(x) =a0 (1−x/κ).

At the end of the next paragraph, “given a and r” should read “given a(x) and r”.

In the caption of Figure 5, the third equation should read dw/dt = f a* x–(γ1 – γ2)w –pzw.

The authors are exceptionally grateful to Ben Bolker, Jess Beasley, and Carol Chaffee for bringing attention to these errors.

Post Your Note (For Public Viewing)
Compose Your Note
 
Declare any competing interests.
Add a note to this text.
Please follow our guidelines for notes and comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  • Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  • Unsupported assertions or statements
  • Inflammatory or insulting language
Add a note to this text.
You must be logged in to add a note to an article. You may log in by clicking here or cancel this note.
Add a note to this text.
You cannot annotate this area of the document. Close
Add a note to this text.
You cannot create an annotation that spans different sections of the document; please adjust your selection.
Close
Rate This Article
Please follow our guidelines for rating and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  1. Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  2. Unsupported assertions or statements
  3. Inflammatory or insulting language
Compose Your Annotation
 
Declare any competing interests.

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.