- Download: PDF | Citation | XML
- Print article
- Order Reprints
Published in the October 2005 Issue of PLoS Medicine
Share this Article info
Open Access
Correspondence
Layperson's View
- To add a note, highlight some text. Hide notes
- Make a general comment
1 New York, New York, United States of America
Citation: Autry S (2005) Layperson's View. PLoS Med 2(10): e363. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020363
Published: October 25, 2005
Copyright: © 2005 Simone Autry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
E-mail: indiratheone@yahoo.com
In regards to the media's dissemination of health information [1], I think there are the following three problems. Firstly, the media are shamefully sensational. Headlines can be misleading just to draw attention to them. Secondly, the media publish conflicting study reports (often going back and forth between conflicting findings more than once). Then, they find people to dispense advice based on these reports (also going back and forth multiple times) without giving good explanations as to why there are conflicting reports. Thirdly, if I were to summarize my thoughts about what I hear in the media, it would be that everything fights cancer if it doesn't kill you first. What was good for you last week will kill you this week. There is no point, then, in following advice.
References Top
- (2005) What are the roles and responsibilities of the media in disseminating health information? PLoS Med 2: e215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020215.
Add a note to this text.
Post Your Note (For Public Viewing)