Search
Advanced Search
Metrics info
Average Rating (2 User Ratings)
    • Currently 5/5 Stars.
    See all categories
      • Currently 5/5 Stars.
      • Currently 5/5 Stars.
      • Currently 5/5 Stars.
    Rate This Article
More
Share this Article info
  • Bookmark: StumbleUpon Facebook Connotea CiteULike Bibliography

Open Access

Research Article

Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration

0 responses
 translate to practice Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:27 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:27 GMT
0 responses
 Response to Huedo-Medina et al Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:26 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:26 GMT
0 responses
 RESULTS ABOUT ANTIDEPRESSANTS REMAIN ROBUST: AUTHOR REPLIES TO STATISTICAL COMMENTARIES Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:25 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:25 GMT
0 responses
 Questions still remain Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:25 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:25 GMT
0 responses
 Analytic issues Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
 Misinterpretation in Kirsch et al’s article Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
 Two Sources of Bias Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
 Antidepressant Benefits: Misinference from ordinal scales? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
 Is the placebo effect reliable ? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
 A dissenting voice Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
 A Dissenting Opinion Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
 Analytical differences Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
 Parallel discussion going on at BMJ.com Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
 Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: Author Replies to Commentaries Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
 "Chemical imbalances" Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 Catch 22 for researchers: The need for complete and relevant datasets Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 These findings depend on the use of the standardised mean difference Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 initial severity and antidepressant benefits Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 Conformation of current information. Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 Drop-out and intention to treat Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 A spoonful of sugar Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 Omega-3 fatty acids as a first line intervention for depression? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 Long-term studies? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 Regression to the mean Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 Was adherence measured? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 Author Bias in THIS article Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 INADEQUATE CONCLUSION? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
 Losing the point Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 Shake-up and wake-up Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 Results of the meta-analysis may also depend on outcome measures Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 Relevace of this paper to moderate depression Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 Immoderate Conclussion on Moderate Depression Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 The depressing news for antidepressants. Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 naive and ignorant Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 Poor response or poor methodology? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 Immoderate Conclussion on Moderate Depression Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 These are not all SSRIs Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 Neil Stewart is correct; a personal perspective Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 Media coverage Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
 Antidepressants and me Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
0 responses
 Patient's Perpective Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
0 responses
 Longer Period Required for Antidepressant - Placebo Comparison Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
0 responses
 Tackling publication bias Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
0 responses
 An unrealistic view Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Rate This Article
Please follow our guidelines for rating and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  1. Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  2. Unsupported assertions or statements
  3. Inflammatory or insulting language
Compose Your Annotation
 
Declare any competing interests.

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.