Search
Advanced Search
Metrics info
Average Rating (0 User Ratings)
    • Currently 0/5 Stars.
    See all categories
      • Currently 0/5 Stars.
      • Currently 0/5 Stars.
      • Currently 0/5 Stars.
    Rate This Article
More
Share this Article info
  • Bookmark: StumbleUpon Facebook Connotea CiteULike Bibliography

Open Access

Research Article

Randomized, Controlled Intervention Trial of Male Circumcision for Reduction of HIV Infection Risk: The ANRS 1265 Trial

0 responses
 AIDS in Third World Countries Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:00 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:00 GMT
0 responses
 Apparent Error in Table 2 or Table 4 Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:51 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:51 GMT
0 responses
 Ethical Issues related to the Orange Farm Study Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:50 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:50 GMT
0 responses
 False alarm for women Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:49 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:49 GMT
0 responses
 Corresponding Authors' reply Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:49 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:49 GMT
0 responses
 Evidence for Non-Sexual HIV Acquisition during a Study of Male Circumcision Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:49 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:49 GMT
0 responses
 Trial of circumcision for HIV prevention should be interpreted with caution Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
0 responses
 Male circumcision increases risk for females Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
0 responses
 Major potential confounder not addressed Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
0 responses
 Estimated Protection Too Conservative Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
0 responses
 Circumcision option Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
0 responses
 The protective effect of male circumcision as a faith lift for the troubled paradigm of HIV epidemiology in sub-Saharan Africa Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:48 GMT
0 responses
 Two groups not on all fours Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
0 responses
 Rubbery figures? Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
0 responses
 SOME PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL HURDLES FOR CIRCUMCISION AS AN HIV / AIDS PANACEA Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
0 responses
 Circumcision and HIV: Melanin Content of Foreskin may Indicate Those Most at Risk of Infection Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
0 responses
 Rush to judgement Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
0 responses
 Auvert RCT does not justify neonatal circumcision Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
0 responses
 On Evidence in support of Male Circumcision in HIV Prevention: What Next? Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
0 responses
 Compensation or compulsion? Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:47 GMT
0 responses
 Male circumcision and HIV in Africa Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:46 GMT
Most recent response on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:46 GMT
Rate This Article
Please follow our guidelines for rating and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  1. Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  2. Unsupported assertions or statements
  3. Inflammatory or insulting language
Compose Your Annotation
 
Declare any competing interests.

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.