The PLoS Medicine Debate

The PLoS Medicine Debate The PLOS Medicine Debate discusses important but controversial issues in clinical practice, public health policy, or health in general. Debates will be commissioned from two or more authors with differing points of view.

See all article types »

Can Routine Commercial Cord Blood Banking Be Scientifically and Ethically Justified?

  • Nicholas M Fisk,
  • Irene A. G Roberts,
  • Roger Markwald,
  • Vladimir Mironov
  • Published: February 22, 2005
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020044

About the Authors

Competing Interests

NMF is a consultant to OmniCyte, and chaired the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' Scientific Advisory Committee at the time of its opinion paper on cord blood banking. He is on the editorial board of PLoS Medicine. IAGR declares that she has no competing interests. RM is an unpaid consultant on the Board of Advisors of CureSource, a commercial umbilical cord blood bank. VM declares that he has no competing interests.