Advertisement
Best Practice

Best Practice The Best Practice section, which was published until May 2006, summarized the current evidence on an important health intervention. PLOS Medicine no longer publishes this article type in the journal.

See all article types »

Educating the Brain to Avoid Dementia: Can Mental Exercise Prevent Alzheimer Disease?

  • Margaret Gatz
  • Published: January 25, 2005
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020007

Reader Comments (2)

Post a new comment on this article

Accounting for individual differences in risk of Alzheimer disease

Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:40 GMT

Author: Margaret Gatz
Position: Professor
Institution: Dept of Psychology, University of Southern California
E-mail: gatz@usc.edu
Submitted Date: February 04, 2005
Published Date: February 15, 2005
This comment was originally posted as a “Reader Response” on the publication date indicated above. All Reader Responses are now available as comments.

Grant describes as incorrect the statement that at least half of the explanation for individual differences in risk for Alzheimer disease is genetic. He suggests instead that dietary and lifestyle factors explain the majority of individual susceptibility to Alzheimer disease.

The basis for asserting a 50% or greater role for genetics in Alzheimer disease risk comes from family studies and from twin studies. In family studies, first-degree relatives of individuals with Alzheimer disease are at more than double the risk of Alzheimer disease compared to those with no affected relatives [1,2]. In twin studies, across different Scandinavian twin registries, estimates of heritability of Alzheimer disease range from 55% to over 70% [3].

Genetic risk undoubtedly represents the cumulative influence of many genes, including apolipoprotein E (APOE) and other genes not yet identified. In particular, it appears that the magnitude of the genetic component of Alzheimer disease risk is similar across ethnic communities, but that different genetic factors may contribute differently to that risk in white, Latino, and African American families [4].

Further, there are interactions between genetic and environmental risks, for example, between the APOE e4 allele and high cholesterol [5] or head injury [6].

Clearly Alzheimer disease is the outcome of multiple genetic and multiple environmental influences, operating additively and interactively. If genetic effects account for half of individual differences in liability, then environmental influences also account for half of the variation in susceptibility. From a public health viewpoint, it is vital to identify those influences that are modifiable. Controlling blood pressure and avoiding head trauma are examples. However, it is also important to appreciate that individuals bring differences in genetic risk to the table.

References

1. Cupples LA, Farrer LA, Sadovnick AD, Relkin N, Whitehouse P, et al. (2004) Estimating risk curves for first-degree relatives of patients with Alzheimer's disease: The REVEAL study. Genet Med 6: 192-196.

2. Breitner JC (1991) Clinical genetics and genetic counseling in Alzheimer disease. Ann Intern Med 115: 601-606.

3. Pedersen NL, Posner SF, Gatz M. (2001) Multiple threshold models for genetic influences on age of onset for Alzheimerbs disease: Findings in Swedish twins. Am J Med Genet 105: 724-728.

4. Devi G. Ottman R, Tang M-X, Marder K, Stern Y, et al. (2000) Familial aggregation of Alzheimer disease among whites, African Americans, and Caribbean Hispanics in Northern Manhattan. Arch Neurol 57: 72-77.

5. Jarvik GP, Wijisman EM, Kukull WA, Schellenberg GD, Yu C, et al (1995) Interactions of apolipoprotein E genotype, total cholesterol level, age, and sex in prediction of Alzheimer's disease: A case-control study. Neurology 45: 1092-1096.

6. Mayeux R, Ottman R, Maestre G, Ngai C, Tang M-X, et al. (1995) Synergistic effects of traumatic head injury and apolipoprotein-epsilon 4 in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 45: 555-557.

Competing interests declared: The author declares that she has no competing interests.