Policy Forum

Policy Forum Policy Forum articles provide a platform for health policy makers from around the world to discuss the challenges and opportunities in improving health care to their constituencies.

See all article types »

Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?

  • Hilda Bastian mail,

    Affiliation: German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany

  • Paul Glasziou,

    Affiliation: Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia

  • Iain Chalmers

    Affiliation: James Lind Library, James Lind Initiative, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Published: September 21, 2010
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326

Reader Comments (7)

Post a new comment on this article

It's easy to keep up: Stop depending on human analysts

Posted by jshrager on 30 Dec 2010 at 04:21 GMT

Although human analysts obviously cannot keep up with the need for updated meta-analyses, computers can very easily. All that's needed is for the reporters of trials to report the their results in a computer-understandable format (which they pretty much already do!), and then use automated meta-analysis to summarize the results on a continuous basis. This method can incorporate all sort of results, including case studies (cf., and the results can be reported out in the form of web-based applications (cf. http://therapy.collabrx.c...).

No competing interests declared.