Essay Essays are opinion pieces on a topic of broad interest to a general medical audience.

See all article types »

Does Development Assistance for Health Really Displace Government Health Spending? Reassessing the Evidence

  • Rajaie Batniji mail,

    Affiliation: Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America

  • Eran Bendavid
  • Published: May 08, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001214

Reader Comments (21)

Post a new comment on this article

Text doesn't match results

Posted by droodman on 10 May 2012 at 20:33 GMT

Even if we accept the concerns about data consistency and accept the highly imputed data, the relationship between DAH and GHE-S is not stable to the exclusion of a few data points. We replicated the author's fixed effects model (Arellano-Bover/Blundell Bond model). We confirmed their main results, but we further explored the sensitivity of the results to the exclusion of questionable data. The associations failed significance testing at p = 0.05 when excluding the lowest 10% of GHE-S using the IMF data and the lowest 20% of the WHO data.

I think most readers will read this to say: "We replicated the original regressions, tested them for robustness to exclusion of suspect data. They failed." But in the key results, in Table 4, the key parameter remains statistically significant 7 out of 8 times. (Look for the p values at or near 0 in the rows labelled "Arellano-Bond/Blundell-Bond model.")

No competing interests declared.