Advertisement
Editorial

Peer Review in PLoS Medicine

  • The PLoS Medicine Editors
  • Published: January 30, 2007
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040058

Reader Comments (4)

Post a new comment on this article

Ethics - Journals should all be transparent

Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:05 GMT

Author: susanne mccabe
Position: No occupation was given
Institution: No affiliation was given
E-mail: soostevens@hotmail.com
Submitted Date: February 12, 2007
Published Date: February 13, 2007
This comment was originally posted as a “Reader Response” on the publication date indicated above. All Reader Responses are now available as comments.

I have asked Liz Wager if she is still on the BMJ Ethics Committee and she confirms this so. Surely it is as relevant a piece of information particularly in this context, as the title of 'Publications Consultant'? Some readers will already know but others will not be aware that the BMJ still has an Ethics Committee as it no longer publishes information about it's activities on their website. It would be interesting to learn whether the BMJ Ethics Committee (which I am informed still meets four times a year) shares Liz's views and helpful to see the site set up again as minutes of meetings or the collective decisions of the Ethics Committee re republication ethics are not routinely published - despite a committment to do so some years ago.

Competing interests declared: no competing interest but longstanding involvement in debates re medical ethics