Search
Advanced Search

View and Join Ongoing Discussions

0 responses
translate to practice Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:27 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:27 GMT
0 responses
Response to Huedo-Medina et al Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:26 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:26 GMT
0 responses
RESULTS ABOUT ANTIDEPRESSANTS REMAIN ROBUST: AUTHOR REPLIES TO STATISTICAL COMMENTARIES Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:25 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:25 GMT
0 responses
Questions still remain Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:25 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:25 GMT
0 responses
Analytic issues Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
Misinterpretation in Kirsch et al’s article Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
Two Sources of Bias Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
Antidepressant Benefits: Misinference from ordinal scales? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
Is the placebo effect reliable ? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:24 GMT
0 responses
A dissenting voice Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
A Dissenting Opinion Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
Analytical differences Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
Parallel discussion going on at BMJ.com Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: Author Replies to Commentaries Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:23 GMT
0 responses
"Chemical imbalances" Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
Catch 22 for researchers: The need for complete and relevant datasets Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
These findings depend on the use of the standardised mean difference Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
initial severity and antidepressant benefits Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
Conformation of current information. Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
Drop-out and intention to treat Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
A spoonful of sugar Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
Omega-3 fatty acids as a first line intervention for depression? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
Long-term studies? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
Regression to the mean Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
Was adherence measured? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
Author Bias in THIS article Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
INADEQUATE CONCLUSION? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:22 GMT
0 responses
Losing the point Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
Shake-up and wake-up Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
Results of the meta-analysis may also depend on outcome measures Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
Relevace of this paper to moderate depression Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
Immoderate Conclussion on Moderate Depression Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
The depressing news for antidepressants. Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
naive and ignorant Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
Poor response or poor methodology? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
Immoderate Conclussion on Moderate Depression Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
These are not all SSRIs Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
Neil Stewart is correct; a personal perspective Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
Media coverage Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:21 GMT
0 responses
Antidepressants and me Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
0 responses
Patient's Perpective Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
0 responses
Longer Period Required for Antidepressant - Placebo Comparison Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
0 responses
Tackling publication bias Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
0 responses
An unrealistic view Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT
Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:20 GMT

You can also make a new comment on this article.

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.