View and Join Ongoing Discussions
Original ArticleEffect of the California Tobacco Control Program on Personal Health Care Expenditures
| 9 responses |
Competing Interests of Glantz Must Be Declared | Posted by plosmedicine on 29 Apr 2009 at 13:42 GMT |
| Most recent response on 23 Aug 2010 at 23:54 GMT | ||
| 0 responses |
The Nature of the Program Matters | Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:31 GMT |
| Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:31 GMT | ||
| 0 responses |
Tone and complication | Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:31 GMT |
| Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:31 GMT | ||
| 0 responses |
SciVee Pubcast | Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT |
| Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT | ||
| 0 responses |
Cannot calculate a change in total expenditures from a change in per capita expenditures if the underlying population has also changed | Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT |
| Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT | ||
| 0 responses |
Association Does Not Prove Cause | Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT |
| Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT | ||
| 0 responses |
Should Authors Declare Competing Interests? | Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT |
| Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT | ||
| 0 responses |
The Authors Reply | Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT |
| Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT | ||
| 0 responses |
Not in the long run | Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT |
| Most recent response on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:29 GMT | ||
You can also make a new comment on this article.